uk

Article

Children’s participation as an architectural component of post-war reconstruction in Ukraine

Oksana Iurchyshyn
Abstract

In the context of full-scale war and post-war transformation, Ukrainian architecture faced the challenge of transitioning from the technocratic reconstruction of physical objects to the restoration of the social fabric of cities. The aim of the study was to determine the role of children’s participation in the humanisation of the architectural environment and to justify new approaches to the formation of educational and public spaces in the post-war period. The methodological basis of the work was the concepts of dialogical space, co-design and spatial agency, integrated into the architectural analysis of reconstruction processes. The article considered children’s participation as a potentially strategic architectural component capable of influencing the rethinking of established approaches to spatial planning. Based on the systematisation of theoretical models and the analysis of international and Ukrainian practical cases, it was shown that the integration of children’s experience influenced the morphology and functional organisation of architectural objects. In the spatial plane, the results of the study indicated an increase in attention to alternative design approaches, within which, along with rigid functional zoning, the principles of polyvalence were considered, and the monumental scale in certain contexts was complemented by solutions focused on the commensurability, tactility, and accessibility of the environment. It has been established that taking into account the children’s perspective changes the approach to the safety of architectural space – from the logic of isolation to the concept of “active safety” based on transparency, visual connections and social presence. An analysis of priority reconstruction environments – educational, public and transitional – showed that participatory practices help to identify hidden spatial conflicts and design “blind spots” that remain unnoticed in technocratic models. In educational spaces, this has contributed to the formation of environments oriented towards research behaviour; in public spaces, to increased inclusiveness for different age groups; and in temporary and transitional spaces, to rapid adaptation and mastery of space by users in the context of post-traumatic experiences of home loss. The results obtained form the methodological basis for institutionalising child participation in architectural and planning processes, outlining the role of interdisciplinary interaction as a key condition for the humanisation of space and the sustainability of initiatives in the post-war period

Keywords

reconstruction architecture; space and place; participatory design; humanisation of architecture; public spaces

Download article

Received 01.08.2025, Revised 14.11.2025, Accepted 19.12.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 11, No. 4, 2025

Suggested citation

Iurchyshyn, O. (2025). Children’s participation as an architectural component of post-war reconstruction in Ukraine. Architectural Studies, 11(4), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.56318/as/4.2025.33

https://doi.org/10.56318/as/4.2025.33

Pages 33-42

References

  1. Anbari, M., & Soltanzadeh, H. (2015). Child-oriented architecture from the perspective of environmental psychology. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4(3), 137-144.
  2. Anisimov, O., Smirnova, M., & Dulko, I. (2024). Establishment of a new planning system in Ukraine: Institutional change between Europeanization and post-socialist path dependence. Planning Theory & Practice, 25(4), 482-501. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2024.2414973.
  3. Badland, H., Villanueva, K., Alderton, A., Davern, M., & Goldfeld, S. (2023). An urban neighbourhood framework for realising progress towards the New Urban Agenda for equitable early childhood development. Children’s Geographies, 21(6), 1087-1105. doi: 10.1080/14733285.2023.2192339.
  4. Banakh, U., & Lozynskyy, R. (2024). Child-friendly cities: The essence of the concept and students’ participation in their planning (based on the example of Lviv physics and mathematics lyceum). Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Geography, 57, 204-214. doi: 10.30970/vgg.2024.57.10685.
  5. Bartlett, S. (2002). Building better cities with children and youth. Environment & Urbanization, 14(2), 3-10. doi: 10.1177/095624780201400201.
  6. Birch, J., Parnell, R., Patsarika, M., & Šorn, M. (2016). Participating together: Dialogic space for children and architects in the design process. Children’s Geographies, 15(2), 224-236. doi: 10.1080/14733285.2016.1238039.
  7. Bishop, K., & Corkery, L. (2017). Designing cities with children and young people: Beyond playgrounds and skate parks. London: Routledge.
  8. Build Ukraine Back Better. (2025). Roadmap for the sustainable recovery of Ukraine. Kyiv: Build Ukraine Back Better Platform.
  9. Cath, L. (2023). Deeping the roots of children’s participation. Sociedad e Infancias, 7(1), 147-151. doi: 10.5209/soci.88645.
  10. Christensen, P., Hadfield-Hill, S., Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2017). Children living in sustainable built environments: New urbanisms, new citizens. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315750019.
  11. City of Vienna. (n.d.). Vienna Strategy for Children and Youth 2025 to 2030 is adopted. Retrieved from https://www.wien.gv.at/zusammenleben/kinder-und-jugendstrategie.
  12. Clark, A. (2007). Early childhood spaces: Involving young children and practitioners in the design process. Working Papers in Early Childhood Development, No. 45. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522693.
  13. Convention “On the Rights of the Child” Adopted by General Assembly Resolution No. 44/25. (1989, November). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/crc.pdf.
  14. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
  15. Cordero-Vinueza, V.A., Niekerk, F., & van Dijk, T. (2023). Making child-friendly cities: A socio-spatial literature review. Cities, 137, article number 104248. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104248.
  16. Datchenko, N. (2019). Сhild and youth friendly cities: Global and Ukrainian perspective. (Master’s thesis, Ukrainian Catholic University, Lviv, Ukraine).
  17. Derr, V., & Tarantini, E. (2016). “Because we are all people”: Outcomes and reflections from young people’s participation in the planning and design of child-friendly public spaces. Local Environment, 21(12), 1534-1556. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2016.1145643.
  18. Derr, V., Chawla, L., Mintzer, M., Cushing, D.F., & Van Vliet, W. (2013). A city for all citizens: Integrating children and youth from marginalized populations into city planning. Buildings, 3(3), 482-505. doi: 10.3390/buildings3030482.
  19. Ensarioğlu, S.A., & Özsoy, F.A. (2021). Children’s participation in built environment design: The case of “Play Without Barriers” project. ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 18(2), 347-364. doi: 10.5505/itujfa.2021.52386.
  20. European Commission. (n.d.). Child participation in political and democratic life. Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/rights-child/child-participation-political-and-democratic-life_en.
  21. Ezzatian, S. (2017). Barriers to child participation in the formation of urban space. MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of Landscape, 9(39), 38-49.
  22. Feinstein, C., Giertsen, A., & O’Kane, C. (2010). Children’s participation in armed conflict and post-conflict peace building. In Armed conflict and peace building (pp. 53-62). London: Routledge.
  23. Flyvbjerg, B. (2003). Rationality and power. In S. Campbell & S.S. Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 318-329). Oxford: Blackwell.
  24. Francis, M., & Lorenzo, R. (2006). Children and city design: Proactive process and the ‘renewal’ of childhood. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces (pp. 217-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511521232.014.
  25. Gil-Mastalerczyk, J., Proskuryakov, V., & Bosyy, P. (2025). Urbicide in Ukraine: Analysis of environmental destruction – challenges, strategies, and international cooperation (Part 1). Housing Environment, 51(2), 66-76. doi: 10.2478/he-2025-0013.
  26. Haklidir, E.A., Orbey, B., & Şahin, P. (2023). Multiple meanings of child participation in architecture and planning: Revisiting the participation ladder. Tasarım+Kuram, 19(39), 406-426. doi: 10.59215/tasarimkuram.401.
  27. ICMA. (2017). Boulder’s plan to become a child- and youth-friendly city. A city that is friendly to children is a city that is friendly to all. Retrieved from https://icma.org/articles/article/boulders-plan-become-child-and-youth-friendly-city.
  28. Katsavounidou, G., & Sousa, S. (2024). Reimagining urban spaces for children: Insights and future directions. Urban Planning, 9, article number 9434. doi: 10.17645/up.9434.
  29. McAteer, B., Loudon, E., & Higgins, K. (2023). ‘We live here and play here, we should have a say’: An exploration of children’s perceptions of place‐making in the market community, Belfast. Children & Society, 38(5), 1602-1621. doi: 10.1111/chso.12827.
  30. Molloy, S. (2025). Living apart together: Child participation in the context of peace process theory and practice. Peacebuilding, 1-18. doi: 10.1080/21647259.2025.2505381.
  31. Pasyuta, D., Ludviková, D., Treffers, F., Korniyenko, G., Van Epp, T., & Zhang, J. (2023). The public participation handbook of urban planning for Ukraine. Kyiv: Rozkvit Urban Coalition for Ukraine & Ukraine Rebuilding Action Group. doi: 10.36196/0726.2023.
  32. Rigolon, A. (2011). A space with meaning: Children’s involvement in participatory design processes. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal – Annual Review, 5(2), 1833-1874.
  33. Save the Children. (2023). Build Forward: NGO recommendations on Ukraine recovery and reconstruction. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/build-forward-ngo-recommendations-ukraine-recovery-and-reconstruction-june-2023.
  34. Sevinçli, N., & Şahin, B.E. (2024). Rethinking the designs of private spaces in kindergartens through the views of children. Childhood, 31(2), 152-175. doi: 10.1177/09075682241246117.
  35. Stadt Regensburg. (n.d.). Children and young people plan and design playgrounds. Retrieved from https://www.regensburg.de/leben/familien/familienfreundliche-stadt/kinder-und-jugendbeteiligung/spielplatzplanung-und-bau.
  36. Stadtsache. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://stadtsache.de/quartiere.php.
  37. Stavholm, E., Mackley, H., Caughey, J., Heard, A., & Edwards, S. (2024). Co-design with children, families, and educators for understanding children’s digital life-worlds for play and learning. CoDesign, 21(3), 382-397. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2024.2427011.
  38. Strachan, T. (2024). Engaging children and young people in planning. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003271383.
  39. UNICEF. (n.d.). Child-friendly cities. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/ukraine/en/topics/child-friendly-cities.
  40. Urban Rukh “The City Has Me”. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.urbanrukh.com/.
  41. Vinnytsia City Council. (2024). Becoming leaders of change in the Vinnytsia community: The “School of Young Ambassadors of Participation” invites high school students and university students to join its sessions. Retrieved from https://www.vmr.gov.ua/staty-lideramy-zmin-u-vinnytskii-hromadi-shkola-molodykh-ambasadoriv-partysypatsii-zaproshuie-na-zaniattia-starshoklasnykiv-i-studentiv.
  42. Wilhelmsen, T., Øvreås, S., Roll-Hansen, H., Bjerknes, A.-L., & Thorrud, S. (2023). Developing child-friendly cities: Young children’s participation in urban planning. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 4(3), 274-290. doi: 10.37291/2717638X.202343290.
ISSN 2411-801X e-ISSN 2786-7374  UDC 71;72
DOI: 10.56318/as