uk

Article

A sustainable, energy-efficient and eco-friendly wall system for building applications in Ukraine

Mykola Bevz Maryna Bordun Svitlana Shekhorkina Iryna Merylova
Abstract

In response to global environmental challenges and the growing demand for energy-efficient solutions in the construction sector, the search for environmentally safe structural systems with a minimal carbon footprint had become increasingly relevant. This study aimed to develop and analyse an external wall enclosure system made of ecological materials, considering its thermal and hygrothermal performance, as well as assessing its environmental impact in terms of carbon footprint. The research results demonstrated that the proposed structure, based on a cross-laminated timber panel with insulation made from grass mats, had a thermal resistance of 4.9 m2 ·K/W, complying with current building code requirements. The hygrothermal analysis confirmed the internal stability of the wall assembly and the absence of condensation in the coldest month of the year – January (for city Dnipro). The calculated carbon footprint amounted to -23.6 kgCO₂-eq/m2 , indicating the carbon-negative nature of the system due to the use of bio-based materials capable of sequestering carbon throughout their life cycle. Additionally, the obtained indicators were compared with those of the most common building envelope design solutions, confirming the advantages of the proposed structure. Furthermore, a pilot architectural concept of a rehabilitation centre was developed, demonstrating the practical application of sustainable construction strategies based on the offered solution. The practical significance of this study lies in the potential integration of the developed wall design into the construction of modern buildings with enhanced energy efficiency and environmental performance. This aligns with the principles of sustainable development and contributes to reducing the climate impact of the building sector

Keywords

energy-efficient architecture; wall construction; hydrothermal analysis; bio-based insulation; CLT panels; post-war reconstruction

Download article

Received 18.06.2025, Revised 10.11.2025, Accepted 19.12.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 11, No. 4, 2025

Suggested citation

Bevz, M., Bordun, M., Shekhorkina, S., & Merylova, I. (2025). A sustainable, energy-efficient and eco-friendly wall system for building applications in Ukraine. Architectural Studies, 11(4), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.56318/as/4.2025.76

https://doi.org/10.56318/as/4.2025.76

Pages 76-90

References

  1. Abed, J., Rayburg, S., Rodwell, J., & Neave, M. (2022). A review of the performance and benefits of mass timber as an alternative to concrete and steel for improving the sustainability of structures. Sustainability, 14(9), article number 5570. doi: 10.3390/su14095570.
  2. Ali, A., Issa, A., & Elshaer, A. (2024). A comprehensive review and recent trends in thermal insulation materials for energy conservation in buildings. Sustainability, 16(20), article number 8782. doi: 10.3390/su16208782.
  3. Amiri, A., & Junnila, S. (2025). How much upfront-embodied GHG emissions can wooden buildings save – displacement factors for wooden buildings. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 5(2), article number 025012. doi: 10.1088/2634-4505/addc16.
  4. Babenko, M., Estokova, A., Savytskyi, M., & Unčík, S. (2018). Study of thermal properties of lightweight insulation made of flax straw. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, 26(2), 9-14. doi: 10.2478/sjce-2018-0008.
  5. Babenko, M., Klitou, T., Klumbyte, E., & Fokaides, P.A. (2025). Environmental assessment of mycelium based straw insulation composite: A sustainability analysis at building material level. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22, article number e04572. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04572.
  6. Bjånesøy, S., Kinnunen, A., Einarsdóttir, H., & Heinonen, J. (2023). Carbon storage in the built environment: A review. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 3(4), article number 042003. doi: 10.1088/2634-4505/ad139f.
  7. Cascione, V., Roberts, M., Allen, S., Dams, B., Maskell, D., & Shea, A. (2022). Life cycle assessment of circular bio-based construction. Construction Technologies and Architecture, 1, 124-134. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.124.
  8. Castro, S.M.H., Rodríguez, R.C., López Arquillo, J.D., & Álvarez de Eulate, M.P. (2025). Comparative evaluation of construction insulation materials: Environmental performance across production, end-of-life, and beyond system boundaries. Journal of Building Engineering, 99, article number 111570. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111570.
  9. Chen, P., Zhang, S., Meng, J., Lei, T., Li, B., & Coffman, D. (2023). Technological solutions to China’s carbon neutrality in the steel and cement sectors. Earth’s Future, 11(9), article number e2022EF003255. doi: 10.1029/2022EF003255.
  10. DBN V.2.6-31:2021. (2023). Thermal insulation and energy efficiency of buildings. Retrieved from https://e-construction.gov.ua/laws_detail/3075196638495507996.
  11. Dipromisto. (2015). General scheme for planning the territory of Ukraine. Facebook. Retrieved from https://lnk.ua/J4ZRMEQ4E.
  12. DSTU 9191:2022. (2023). Thermal insulation of buildings. Method for choosing insulation material for building insulation. Retrieved from https://eurobud.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/dstu-9191-2022-teploizolyacziya-budivel-metod-vyboru-teploizolyaczijnogo-materialu-dlya-uteplennya-budivel.pdf.
  13. DSTU-N B V.1.1-27:2010. (2011). Building climatology. Retrieved from https://dbn.co.ua/load/normativy/dstu/dstu_b_v_1_1_27_2010/5-1-0-929.
  14. DSTU-N B V.2.6-192:2013. (2014). Manual of design evaluation of heat and humidity conditions of building envelopes. Retrieved from https://teplovizor-plus.lviv.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/dstu-v-2-6-192.pdf.
  15. EN 15978:2011. (2011). Sustainability of construction works – assessment of environmental performance of buildings – calculation method. Retrieved from https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/62c22cef-5666-4719-91f9-c21cb6aa0ab3/en-15978-2011?srsltid=AfmBOoqho5EP7IMOeR4GOpAJAQc1Vhlp9uwPke3aDACEu6VqVdl4J87G.
  16. Fang, X., Li, J., & Ma, Q. (2023). Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 98, article number 104843. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843.
  17. Goh, C.S., Ting, J.N., & Bajracharya, A. (2023). Exploring social sustainability in the built environment. Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research, 4(1), article number 010. doi: 10.21926/aeer.2301010.
  18. Hegeir, O.A., Kvande, T., Stamatopoulos, H., & Bohne, R.A. (2022). Comparative life cycle analysis of timber, steel, and reinforced concrete portal frames: A theoretical study on a Norwegian industrial building. Buildings, 12(5), article number 573. doi: 10.3390/buildings12050573.
  19. Ijjada, N., & Nayaka, R.R. (2022). Review on properties of some thermal insulating materials providing more comfort in the building. Materials Today: Proceedings, 58, 1354-1359. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.230.
  20. International EPD System. (n.d.). EPD library. Retrieved from https://www.environdec.com/library.
  21. Jeong, G.Y. (2024). Status of CLT building construction from 2004 to 2023. Construction and Building Materials, 449, article number 138496. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138496.
  22. Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2013). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken: Wiley.
  23. Li, C., Pradhan, P., Chen, G., Kropp, J.P., & Schellnhuber, H.J. (2025). Carbon footprint of the construction sector is projected to double by 2050 globally. Communications Earth & Environment, 6, article number 831. doi: 10.1038/s43247-025-02840-x.
  24. Ljunggren, F., Fredriksson, M., Johansson, N., & Sasik Kalagasidis, A. (2025). Cross-laminated timber: A state-of-the-art review of moisture, fire, acoustics, and energy-related aspects. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 1-23. doi: 10.1080/17480272.2025.2507145.
  25. Merylova, I., Shekhorkina, S., Panchenko, T., Zakharov, M., & Talash, A. (2024). Methodological approaches to designing biophilic rehabilitation buildings. E3S Web of Conferences, 534, article number 01014. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202453401014.
  26. Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine. (n.d.). Draft Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “Certain Issues Related to the Implementation of an Experimental Project on Providing Extended Palliative Medical Care Services for Combat Injuries and care, as well as Long-Term Inpatient Rehabilitation Assistance to Certain Categories of Persons, who Defended the Independence, Sovereignty, and Territorial Integrity of Ukraine”. Retrieved from https://mva.gov.ua/en/gromadskosti/category/193-consultations-with-the-public/proekt-postanovi-kabinetu-ministriv-ukraini-deyaki-pitannya-realizatsii-eksperimentalnogo-proektu-schodo-nadannya-rozshirenih-poslug-z-paliativnoi-medichnoi-dopomogi-boyovih-ushkodzhen-ta-doglyadu-a-takozh-dovgotrivaloi-reabilitatsiynoi-dopomogi-u-statsionarnih-umovah-okremim-kategoriyam-osib-yaki-zahischali-nezalezhnist-suverenitet-ta-teritorialnu-tsilisnist-ukraini.
  27. Ottomano Palmisano, G., Rocchi, L., Negri, L., & Piscitelli, L. (2025). Evaluating the progress of the EU countries towards implementation of the European Green Deal: A multiple criteria approach. Land, 14(1), article number 141. doi: 10.3390/land14010141.
  28. Physibel. (n.d.). 2D & 3D thermal simulation. Retrieved from https://www.physibel.be/en/products.
  29. Pittau, F., Krause, F., Lumia, G., & Habert, G. (2018). Fast-growing bio-based materials as an opportunity for storing carbon in exterior walls. Building and Environment, 129, 117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.006.
  30. Ranefjärd, O., Strandberg-de Bruijn, P.B., & Wadsö, L. (2024). Hygrothermal properties and performance of bio-based insulation materials locally sourced in Sweden. Materials, 17(9), article number 2021. doi: 10.3390/ma17092021.
  31. Röck, M., Saade, M.R.M., Balouktsi, M., Rasmussen, F.N., Birgisdottir, H., Frischknecht, R., Habert, G., Lützkendorf, T., & Passer, A. (2020). Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – the hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Applied Energy, 258, article number 114107. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107.
  32. Schubert, M., Panzarasa, G., & Burgert, I. (2022). Sustainability in wood products: A new perspective for handling natural diversity. Chemical Reviews, 123(5), 1889-1924. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00360.
  33. Shekhorkina, S., Zinkevych, O., & Kovtun-Horbachova, T. (2023). Revealing timber structures potential in decarbonization of low-rise residential buildings. Modern Structures of Metal and Wood, 27, 28-34. doi: 10.31650/2707-3068-2023-27-28-34.
  34. Švajlenka, J., & Pošiváková, T. (2023). Innovation potential of wood constructions in the context of sustainability and efficiency of the construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 411, article number 137209. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137209.
  35. World Green Building Council. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://worldgbc.org/.
  36. Ye, F., Wei, H., Xiao, Y., Berardi, U., Quaranta, G., & Demartino, C. (2025). Bio-based insulation materials in sustainable constructions: A review of environmental, thermal and acoustic insulation, durability, and mechanical performances. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 223, article number 115872. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115872.
  37. Zhong, X., Hu, M., Deetman, S., Steubing, B., Lin, H.X., Hernandez, G.A., Harpprecht, C., Zhang, C., Tukker, A., & Behrens, P. (2021). Global greenhouse gas emissions from residential and commercial building materials and mitigation strategies to 2060. Nature Communications, 12, article number 6126. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26212-z.
ISSN 2411-801X e-ISSN 2786-7374  UDC 71;72
DOI: 10.56318/as